Argumentos para la despenalización
Browse by
Recent Submissions
-
ADPF 442/DF Public Hearing in the Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil .August 3, 2018 Testimony by Rebecca J. Cook, C.M, M.P.A., J.D., J.S.D., F.R.S.C. Professor of Law Emerita Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, Canada on behalf of Latin American Consortium against Unsafe Abortion (CLACAI)
(2018)A ruling by the Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil to suspend Articles 124 and 126 of the Penal Code, and to recognize the constitutional right of women to terminate pregnancy during the first twelve weeks of pregnancy, ... -
O princípio da proporcionalidade no controle de constitucionalidade das leis sobre aborto
(Publicum, 2016)Os tribunais têm se tornado cada vez mais conscientes da necessidade de adotarem uma abordagem principiológica para a resolução de conflitos constitucionais, exercida por meio de um juízo de ponderação. Conforme os julgamentos ... -
Aborto em Portugal: novas tendencias no constitucionalismo europeu
(Revista Direito GV, 2017)O presente capítulo procura desvendar esta evolução da jurisprudência constitucional do aborto em Portugal e identificar as circunstâncias jurídicas e políticas da formação da nova doutrina constitucional que hoje predomina ... -
Incorporación Constitucional del Derecho Internacional y del Derecho Comparado de los Derechos Humanos: La Sentencia C-355/2006 de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia por Verónica Undurraga, Centro de Derechos Humanos, Universidad de Chile y Rebecca Cook, Facultad de Derecho Universidad de Toronto
(2009)Este trabajo examina la forma en que la Corte protegió los derechos de las mujeres embarazadas en el contexto del aborto, mediante la incorporación a su examen de constitucionalidad del derecho internacional de los derechos ... -
C-355/2006. Extractos de la sentencia de la Corte Constitucional que liberalizó la sentencia de la Corte Constitucional que liberalizó el aborto en Colombia,
(Women’s Link Worldwide, 2007)El 10 de Mayo de 2006 la Corte Constitucional colombiana anuncio una decisión histórica; el aborto no podía seguir considerándose un delito en tres cir- cunstancias: cuando la vida o la salud (física o mental) de la mujer ... -
El aborto en el derecho transnacional: Casos y controversias. Solo índice y carátula
(Fondo de Cultura Económica; CIDE, 2016)Los ensayos reunidos en esta obra han sido organizados en torno a cuatro temas principales: los valores constitucionales y los regímenes normativos; la justicia procesal y el acceso liberalizado; la interpretación y ... -
El Tribunal Constitucional del Reino de Tailandia, Sentencia no. 4 de 2563 (2020) ordena la revisión del Código Penal sección 301, que viola las Secciones 27 o 28 de la Constitución de 2017, que respaldan la igualdad de derechos entre hombres y mujeres, así como el derecho y la libertad de todos en su vida y persona. Decisión de 19 de febrero de 2020. Sumario de Corte en ingles)
(2020)[Declared unconstitutional: Criminal Code section 301, allowing a fine or up to three years in prison for a woman who had an abortion; Court ordered revision of this section.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 75/2010, Diario da Republica vol. 60, 2010.. Sentencia en portugués.
(2010)[upheld as constitutional: law allowing abortion upon request within first 10 weeks: if performed under a doctor’s direction, at an officially recognized health facility, after a mandatory information session and a 3 day ... -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 617/2006, Diário da República I Série, 2006.. Sentencia en portugués
(2006)[The referendum question whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks if completed in a legally authorized health care establishment was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 288/98, Diário da República 91/98 Suplemento I-A Série, 1998. Sentencia en portugués.
(1998)[The referendum question asking the public whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 85/85, Acórdãos do Tribunal Constitucional V,1985. Sentencia en portugués
(1985)[upheld law decriminalizing abortion in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s health or fetal abnormalities] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 25/84, Acórdãos do Tribunal Constitucional II, 1984. Sentencia en portugués.
(1984)[upheld law decriminalizing abortion in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s health or fetal abnormalities] -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Lakshmi Dhikta v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 0757, 2067, Nepal Kanoon Patrika, 2009. Sentencia y el resumen en inglés.
(2009)[woman could not afford a legal abortion was forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy and give birth; Court held government has to guarantee safe and affordable abortion services including establishing a fund for abortion costs.] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación [Supreme Court] 2021, Acción de inconstitucionalidad AI 148/2017, Sept 7, 2021 Sentencia en español
(2021)[criminalizing abortion is unconstitutional; state interests in protecting fetus cannot outweigh the reproductive rights of women.] -
Corte Constitucional, sentencia no. 27, 98 Foro It. I, 515, 18 de febrero de 1975. Sentencia en italiano. Sentencia en inglés
(1975)[Penal code provision criminalizing all abortions deemed unconstitutional; fetus has a right to life, but abortion will be lawful if continuing the pregnancy endangers the life, physical or mental health of the mother.] -
In the matter of an application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission forJudicial Review [2018] UKSC27 On appeal from: [2017] NICA 42 (Supreme Court, U.K.), 7 June, 2018. Sentencia en Inglés
(2018)Substantial agreement with NIHRC ruling of 2015 above, but NIHRC lacked standing to bring the appeal, so could not declare NI abortion laws incompatible -
Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission, Re Judicial Review [2015] NIQB 96, November 30, 2015 (High Court of Justice in Belfast). Sentencia en Inglés.
(2015)Northern Ireland’s abortion laws are incompatible with European Convention on Human Rights Article 8 because it does not allow exceptions for fatal fetal abnormalities, rape, or incest.The judgment also has implications ...