Clasificación por fuente: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 581-600 de 1501
-
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007). Decisión en Inglés.
(2007)Court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban, a law which effectively banned most late-term abortions: states have an interest in preserving life and the ban fit into this interest as it did not create an undue burden on women -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. _ (2022) (Supreme Court of the United States), June 24, 2022 Decision online
(2022)Amicus brief by Martha Davis et al. [held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion. -
Corte de Apelaciones del Segundo Distrito de California, Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital, 208 Cal. App. 3d 405; 256 Cal. Rptr. 240 (1989). Sentencia en inglés
(1989)Catholic hospital did not violate a law when it (1) refused to provide emergency contraception to a rape victim and (2) refused to inform her that she could obtain emergency contraception from a health professional within ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622. (1979). Sentencia en inglés.
(1979)Massachusetts law on parental consent declared unconstitutional; where a state requires a minor to obtain parental consent before procuring abortion, there must also be an alternative procedure for a minor to procure ... -
Tribunal Supremo de España, Sala Tercera, de lo Contencioso-administrativo, Sección 4ª, S 1231/2022, 3 Oct. 2022 (Rec. 6147/2021) Sentencia en español.
(2022)La Administración no puede bloquear sin autorización judicial el acceso a una web que contenga información u opinión -- incluyendo información sobre servicios de aborto (Women on Web -
Zurich Insurance PLC, Sucursal en España v. Doña Encarnacion y don César y Servicio Galego de Saude, Sentencia 00392/2017, Apelación 43/17 (High Court of Galicia at Coruña, Spain) Sentencia en español.
(2017)La sanidad pública condenada por retrasar el aborto de una mujer que perdió su útero por culpa de la objeción de conciencia médica -
Tribunal Constitucional, Sentencia S.T.C. 53/1985, 1985-49 BJC 515, 11 de abril de 1985. Sentencia en español
(1985)Upheld constitutionality of draft law decriminalizing abortion in cases of risk to physical or mental health of woman, cases of rape, and fetal malformation; law had procedural defects which needed correction; law was ... -
Ústavný Súd [Tribunal Constitucional], Decisión PL. ÚS 12/01, Colección de Leyes de la República de Eslovaquia No. 14/2008, vol. 8, 4 de diciembre de 2007. Sentencia en espanol.
(2007)Upheld constitutionality of 1986 law allowing abortions up to 12 weeks' gestation; abortions for “genetic” reasons such as fetal abnormalities allowed after 12 weeks -
Case on the Crimes of Abortion, Apr 11, 2019 / Case No. : 2017Hun-Ba127, KCCR) (Constitutional Court of Korea) en Ingles, "Major Decisions". PDF downloaded 30 mayo 2019
(2019)Abortion law is unconstitutional and will be abolished in one year unless replaced. -
Case on the Prohibition of Revealing the Sex of a Fetus, Case No. 2004Hun-Ma1010, KCCR (Constitutional Court of Korea). Decision of July 31, 2008. Official summary in English. Extra copy
(2008)Prohibition of fetal sex disclosure is limited to before 32 weeks' gestation. -
Case on the Recognition of Fetuses as Entities with Fundamental Rights, Case No. 2004Hun-Ba81, July 31, 2008. Official Summary.
(2008)Fetus has constitutional right to life, but parents cannot inherit right to sue doctor on fetus's behalf -
Corte Constitucional [Constitutional Court] February 21, 2022, Sentencia C-055-22. English summary by Causa Justa. 27-page Spanish communicado. 27-page unofficial English translation. Nota de Prensa (Spanish). Unofficial English translation.
(2022)Abortion is decriminalized within 24 weeks of gestation -
Corte Constitucional, March 2, 2020. Expediente D-13225, Boletín No. 25: La ausencia de claridad, certeza, especificidad pertinencia y suficiencia en los cargos de inconstitucionalidad formulados en contra del artículo 122 del Código Penal, condujo a que la Corte se inhibiera de proferir una decisión de fondo. Decisión en español
(2020)Three exceptions to criminal law against abortion will continue; all other abortion remains illegal. -
Corte Constitucional, December 11, 2019, Sentencia SU-599/19.
(2019)Females forced into an armed group who suffer forced contraception or forced abortion qualify as "victims" in reparations law after armed conflict. -
Corte Constitucional [Constitutional Court], 2018, Sentencia SU-096/18. Decision in Spanish
(2018)Government to facilitate access to abortion despite conscientious objection. -
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-627/12, 10 de agosto de 2012. Decisión en español. Extra copia
(2012)State must provide accurate information; three state officials must correct false information about emergency contraception, abortion and conscientious objection -
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-841/11, 3 de noviembre de 2011. Decisión en español
(2011)[Health administrator forced to pay damages for obstructing a legal abortion in a case where doctor had certified risk to a minor’s mental health.] -
Corte Constitucional Sentencia T-388/09, 2009. Sentencia en español.
(2009)[Conscientious objection is not an absolute right; it is only allowed when there is another capable health provider is available soon enough to avoid risking the woman’s life or health.] -
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-209/08, 28 de febrero de 2008. Decisión en español
(2008-02-28)[Conscientious objection can only be invoked by natural persons, not institutions; health care system must guarantee an adequate number of providers to provide services for legal abortions.] -
Corte Constitucional, sentencia C-013/97, 14 de mayo enero de 2002. Sentencia en español
(2002)Proportionality principle requires that criminalization be avoided when the state has less restrictive means to secure the same values
