Clasificación por fuente: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 561-580 de 1501
-
Indu Devi v the State of Bihar and Others [2017] Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 14327/2017, Judgment of May 9, 2017 (Supreme Court of India). Sentencia en inglés.. Extra copia. Comment on Reprohealthlaw blog
(2017)HIV-positive raped woman tried to obtain an abortion at 17 weeks and experienced undue delays, for which State of Bihar was chastised. At Supreme Court she was 26 weeks pregnant, so request for abortion was denied because ... -
Corte Constitucional, sentencia48/1998 (XI. 23), Magyar Közlöny [Gaceta Ofi cial] MK 1998/105, 18 de noviembre de 1998. Sentencia en húngaro. Extra copia. Traducción oficial en Inglés
(1998)Law allowing abortion when a pregnant woman is in a situation of "grave crisis" was upheld as constitutional, however the determination of "grave crisis" was deemed unconstitutional as it allowed a woman to self-declare ... -
"DECISION 2001-446 DC OF 27 JUNE 2001. Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy (Abortion) and Contraception Act. Constitutional Council. Sentencia en Inglés"
(1982)El fallo analiza la constitucionaldiad del aborto bajo causales hasta la semaana 14 de gestación y la eliminación de la objeción de conciencia institucional por medio de una reforma a la ley de interrupción voluntaria del ... -
Consejo Constitucional, Décision No. 74-54 DC, D.S.Jur. 529 [1975] A.J.D.A. 134, 15 de enero de 1975. Sentencia en francés. Traducción oficial en Inglés. Extra copia. [
(1975)Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Act upheld as constitutional to allow abortions in cases of necessity or distress after a woman has received counselling. -
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016). Decision online. Backup copy. Commentary on case from Planned Parenthood.
(2016)ATexas law which required abortion providers to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centres and that abortion providers must have admitting privileges at a hosptial within 30 miles was declared unconstitutional ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Sentencia en Inglés
(2000)Nebraska law banning partial-birth abortion without regard for health of the mother declared unconstitutional; Court used the undue burden standard developed in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Sentencia en inglés
(1973)14th amendment right to privacy protects a woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion; the right is not absolute and must be balanced against government interests in protecting prenatal health; trimester model was ... -
Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F. 3rd 771 (1998) (Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals). Decision online.
(1998)Illinois police officer who objected to abortion wanted to be exempt from providing security to abortion clinics on the basis that it acts as religious discrimination; court dismissed the claim] -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Sentencia en inglés
(1992)Court upheld Roe v. Wade, new "undue burden" standard in assessing the validity of abortion laws; undue burden defined as “substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability” -
Corte de Apelaciones del Octavo Circuito, Planned Parenthood of Minn., N.D. & S.D. v. Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, (2011). Sentencia revisado de 2012.
(2012)Upheld South Dakota law requiring doctors to inform abortion-seeking patients that abortions increased risk of suicide ideation and suicide; the law was not considered a violation of freedom of speech or due process rights. -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1976)Declared unconstitutional: a Missouri law requiring spousal consent for a woman to obtain an abortion, and requiring parental consent for a minor to obtain an abortion] -
Supreme Court of El Salvador, Sentencia 18/98 (Inconstitucionalidad), Nov 20, 2007. Sentencia en español.
(2007)Law criminalizing all abortion upheld as constitutional. -
Corte Constituciónal [Constitutional Court], Acción Pública de Inconstitucionalidad, Expediente No. 34-19-IN/21, 28 de abril de 2021. Sumario en español. Sentencia en español
(2021)Abortion allowed in all cases of rape; previously only allowed in cases of rape if woman had a mental disability. -
Corte Constitucional, José Fernando Roser Rohde c. Instituto Nacional de Higiene y Medicina Tropical “Leopoldo Izquiéta Pérez y el Ministro de Salud S/Acción deAmparo, 14 de junio de 2006. Spanish Decision (direct download)
(2006)Constitutional court upheld ban of emergency contraceptives, deciding that the rights of women do not take precedence over the rights of the unborn after fertilization occurs. -
Corte Constitucional de Croatia. Sentencia de 2 de marzo de 2017. Rješenje Ustavnog Suda Republike Hrvatske, broj: U-I-60/1991 i dr. od 21.veljace 2017. Sentencia en croata
(2017)Upheld as constitutional: Law allowing abortion on request within first ten weeks of pregnancy, and thereafter in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s life, or severe fetal impairments. -
Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Constitucional, Sentencia No.442/2004, 2004. 7 de may del 2004. Decisión en español
(2004)prenatal personhood; health provider convicted of homicide -
Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Constitucional. Resolución No 02792-2004, 17 de marzo del 2004. Expediente 02-007331-0007-CO. Resolución en español.
(2004)pre prenatal personhood, wrongful death of fetus -
Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Constitucional, Sentencia No. 2000-02306, 15 de marzo de 2000. Decisión en español.
(2000)ban on in vitro fertilization (due to prenatal personhood -
June Medical Services v. Russo 140 S.Ct. 2103 (2020). Decision online.
(2020)Declared unconstitutional a Louisiana law requiring doctors at abortion clinics to have hospital privileges at a state-authorized hospital within 30 miles of the clinic. -
Corte Suprema de Oklahoma, In RE Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642, 1992 OK 122 (1992). Decisión en inglés.
(1992)Oklahoma Supreme Court prohibited ballot question on abortion because if it was answered in the affirmative, it would be unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey