Estados Unidos
Browse by
Recent Submissions
-
Criminalization and Punishment for Abortion, Stillbirth, Miscarriage, and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
(2023-09-12)Este informe se centra en el castigo y la criminalización de las personas por abortos, muerte fetal, abortos espontáneos y resultados adversos del embarazo. En los Estados Unidos, se producen violaciones de los derechos ... -
Food and Drug Administration et al. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al.
(2024)Un caso en el que se le pidió al Tribunal que resolviera una impugnación a la aprobación por parte de la Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos en 2016 y 2021 del medicamento abortivo mifepristona. -
Abortion in the USA: The Human Rights Crisis in the Aftermath of Dobbs
(Amnistía Internacional, 2024)Este informe comparte las experiencias de personas afectadas por las prohibiciones del aborto y las restricciones al acceso al aborto en los Estados Unidos. Detalla los graves riesgos para la salud y la vida de las mujeres ... -
Period of Sessions N°188. United States Abortion Access
(Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, 2023)Se abordaron temáticas de derechos humanos en 17 países del hemisferio -
Amicus in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
(2023)El presente Amicus curiae se refiere a la solicitud de suspensión de una medida cautelar preliminar pendiente de apelación, en la que cientos de personas y organizaciones se unieron para presentar Amicus curiae ante la ... -
S234A0421. State of Georgia v Sistersong women of color reproductive justice collective et al.
(2023-10-24)El Centro de Derechos Reproductivos y Planned Parenthood presentaron esta demanda el 28 de junio de 2019, impugnando una inminente ley de Georgia que prohíbe los abortos a partir de las seis semanas de embarazo. Los ... -
Resolución No. 23/81, Caso 2141 (“Baby Boy”) interpuesto por los Sres. White y Potter contra los Estados Unidos de América, OAS/Ser.L/V/II.54, doc. 9 rev. 1, 6 de marzo de 1981. Sentencia en español.
(1981)[Abortion scheme in US did not violate the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man nor the American Convention on Human Rights; right to life does not begin at conception in the Declaration, which prevails ... -
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016). Decision online. Backup copy. Commentary on case from Planned Parenthood.
(2016)ATexas law which required abortion providers to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centres and that abortion providers must have admitting privileges at a hosptial within 30 miles was declared unconstitutional ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Sentencia en Inglés
(2000)Nebraska law banning partial-birth abortion without regard for health of the mother declared unconstitutional; Court used the undue burden standard developed in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Sentencia en inglés
(1973)14th amendment right to privacy protects a woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion; the right is not absolute and must be balanced against government interests in protecting prenatal health; trimester model was ... -
Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F. 3rd 771 (1998) (Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals). Decision online.
(1998)Illinois police officer who objected to abortion wanted to be exempt from providing security to abortion clinics on the basis that it acts as religious discrimination; court dismissed the claim] -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Sentencia en inglés
(1992)Court upheld Roe v. Wade, new "undue burden" standard in assessing the validity of abortion laws; undue burden defined as “substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability” -
Corte de Apelaciones del Octavo Circuito, Planned Parenthood of Minn., N.D. & S.D. v. Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, (2011). Sentencia revisado de 2012.
(2012)Upheld South Dakota law requiring doctors to inform abortion-seeking patients that abortions increased risk of suicide ideation and suicide; the law was not considered a violation of freedom of speech or due process rights. -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1976)Declared unconstitutional: a Missouri law requiring spousal consent for a woman to obtain an abortion, and requiring parental consent for a minor to obtain an abortion] -
June Medical Services v. Russo 140 S.Ct. 2103 (2020). Decision online.
(2020)Declared unconstitutional a Louisiana law requiring doctors at abortion clinics to have hospital privileges at a state-authorized hospital within 30 miles of the clinic. -
Corte Suprema de Oklahoma, In RE Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642, 1992 OK 122 (1992). Decisión en inglés.
(1992)Oklahoma Supreme Court prohibited ballot question on abortion because if it was answered in the affirmative, it would be unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007). Decisión en Inglés.
(2007)Court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban, a law which effectively banned most late-term abortions: states have an interest in preserving life and the ban fit into this interest as it did not create an undue burden on women -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. _ (2022) (Supreme Court of the United States), June 24, 2022 Decision online
(2022)Amicus brief by Martha Davis et al. [held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion. -
Corte de Apelaciones del Segundo Distrito de California, Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital, 208 Cal. App. 3d 405; 256 Cal. Rptr. 240 (1989). Sentencia en inglés
(1989)Catholic hospital did not violate a law when it (1) refused to provide emergency contraception to a rape victim and (2) refused to inform her that she could obtain emergency contraception from a health professional within ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622. (1979). Sentencia en inglés.
(1979)Massachusetts law on parental consent declared unconstitutional; where a state requires a minor to obtain parental consent before procuring abortion, there must also be an alternative procedure for a minor to procure ...
RSS 1.0