Buscar
Mostrando ítems 1-6 de 6
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Prakash Mani Sharma v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 064, 2008. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés.
(2008)
[Court action brought over government inaction relating to uterus prolapse; constitutional rights of reproductive health are fundamental, non-derogable, non-restrictive and require meaningful implementation by the state, ...
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Lakshmi Dhikta v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 0757, 2067, Nepal Kanoon Patrika, 2009. Sentencia y el resumen en inglés.
(2009)
[woman could not afford a legal abortion was forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy and give birth; Court held government has to guarantee safe and affordable abortion services including establishing a fund for abortion costs.]
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Meera Dhungana v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 55, 2058, 2002. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés
(2002)
[Rape law is unconstitutional because it excluded marital rape; legislature to create new rape law, consistent with decision of the Court.]
Case on the Prohibition of Revealing the Sex of a Fetus, Case No. 2004Hun-Ma1010, KCCR (Constitutional Court of Korea). Decision of July 31, 2008. Official summary in English. Extra copy
(2008)
Prohibition of fetal sex disclosure is limited to before 32 weeks' gestation.
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Achyut Kharel v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 3352, 2061, 2008. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés.
(2008)
law allowing abortion on request of woman within first 12 weeks upheld; no paternal consent required.
Case on the Recognition of Fetuses as Entities with Fundamental Rights, Case No. 2004Hun-Ba81, July 31, 2008. Official Summary.
(2008)
Fetus has constitutional right to life, but parents cannot inherit right to sue doctor on fetus's behalf