Listar 6. Asia por fecha de publicación
Mostrando ítems 1-12 de 12
-
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Meera Dhungana v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 55, 2058, 2002. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés
(2002)[Rape law is unconstitutional because it excluded marital rape; legislature to create new rape law, consistent with decision of the Court.] -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Prakash Mani Sharma v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 064, 2008. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés.
(2008)[Court action brought over government inaction relating to uterus prolapse; constitutional rights of reproductive health are fundamental, non-derogable, non-restrictive and require meaningful implementation by the state, ... -
Case on the Prohibition of Revealing the Sex of a Fetus, Case No. 2004Hun-Ma1010, KCCR (Constitutional Court of Korea). Decision of July 31, 2008. Official summary in English. Extra copy
(2008)Prohibition of fetal sex disclosure is limited to before 32 weeks' gestation. -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Achyut Kharel v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 3352, 2061, 2008. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés.
(2008)law allowing abortion on request of woman within first 12 weeks upheld; no paternal consent required. -
Case on the Recognition of Fetuses as Entities with Fundamental Rights, Case No. 2004Hun-Ba81, July 31, 2008. Official Summary.
(2008)Fetus has constitutional right to life, but parents cannot inherit right to sue doctor on fetus's behalf -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Lakshmi Dhikta v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 0757, 2067, Nepal Kanoon Patrika, 2009. Sentencia y el resumen en inglés.
(2009)[woman could not afford a legal abortion was forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy and give birth; Court held government has to guarantee safe and affordable abortion services including establishing a fund for abortion costs.] -
Kiyutin v. Russia, App. No. 2700/10, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2011). Sentencia en español
(2011)[Russia's refusal of a residence permit to an HIV+ man to live his wife and child violated the right to nondiscrimination in the exercise of private life; example of stereotyping and stigmatization cited by Rebecca Cook, ... -
Making Abortion Services Accessible in the Wake of Legal Reforms: A Framework and Six Case Studies
(Guttmacher Institute, 2012)La evidencia muestra que las leyes restrictivas del aborto contribuyen sustancialmente a la morbilidad y mortalidad maternas por aborto inseguro, y, en las últimas dos décadas, 26 países se han ampliado las condiciones ... -
Meera Santosh Pal and Ors v Union of India and Ors [2017] Writ Petition (Civil) No. 17 of 2017 January 16 2017 (Supreme Court of India) Sentencia en inglés. Extra copia
(2017)Abortion allowed for anencephalic fetus at 24 weeks due to risk to the woman’s health. -
Indu Devi v the State of Bihar and Others [2017] Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 14327/2017, Judgment of May 9, 2017 (Supreme Court of India). Sentencia en inglés.. Extra copia. Comment on Reprohealthlaw blog
(2017)HIV-positive raped woman tried to obtain an abortion at 17 weeks and experienced undue delays, for which State of Bihar was chastised. At Supreme Court she was 26 weeks pregnant, so request for abortion was denied because ... -
Case on the Crimes of Abortion, Apr 11, 2019 / Case No. : 2017Hun-Ba127, KCCR) (Constitutional Court of Korea) en Ingles, "Major Decisions". PDF downloaded 30 mayo 2019
(2019)Abortion law is unconstitutional and will be abolished in one year unless replaced. -
El Tribunal Constitucional del Reino de Tailandia, Sentencia no. 4 de 2563 (2020) ordena la revisión del Código Penal sección 301, que viola las Secciones 27 o 28 de la Constitución de 2017, que respaldan la igualdad de derechos entre hombres y mujeres, así como el derecho y la libertad de todos en su vida y persona. Decisión de 19 de febrero de 2020. Sumario de Corte en ingles)
(2020)[Declared unconstitutional: Criminal Code section 301, allowing a fine or up to three years in prison for a woman who had an abortion; Court ordered revision of this section.]
