Objeción de Conciencia
Browse by
Recent Submissions
-
Amicus Curiae. Objeción de conciencia: Artículo 119 del proyecto de ley 9895-11, sobre la despenalización de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en tres causales/ Bernard M. Dickens
(2017)Se tenga presente en calidad de amicus curiae a favor de la constitucionalidad del proyecto de ley que regula la despenalización de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en tres causales el siguiente texto escrito por ... -
"Las responsabilidades éticas de la conciencia"
(IPPF, 2009)Contiene: Declaración del IMAP sobre esterlización quirúrgica voluntaria - Las responsabilidades éticas de la conciencia/Bernard M, Dickens -
"Objeción de conciencia" (artículo de Dickens incluido en el recurso)
(2010)Contiene el siguiente artículo: Objeción de conciencia /Bernard Dickens -
Responsabilidades en los servicios de salud y objeción de conciencia. Problemáticas éticas y legales en la salud reproductiva
(2009)La Corte Constitucional Colombiana ha emitido una sentencia de trascendencia internacional que aclara los deberes legales de proveedores, hospitales y sistemas de salud en el caso de objeción de conciencia a la práctica ... -
International Planned Parenthood European Network v. Italy (2014), Complaint No. 87/2012, decision published 10 March 2014 (European Committee on Social Rights, Strasbourg, France) Sentencia en linea.
(2014)[Italy violated the right to health: abortion laws were discriminatory as the only women who were guaranteed access to legal abortion were ones who could afford to travel to various hospitals and regions of the country to ... -
Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy (2016), Complaint No. 91/2013 (European Committee on Social Rights, Strasbourg, France) Sentencia en linea.
(2016)[Italy violated the right to work and the right to dignity in work as doctors who did not conscientiously object to abortion had most of their workload consist of abortion care which had the effect of restricting other ... -
Z. v. Poland, App. No. 46132/08, Eur. Ct. H. R. (2012). Sentencia en Inglés.
(2012)[no violations found in case of a woman repeatedly denied medical care for a condition she contracted while pregnant, since doctors feared that treatment would harm the fetus; result: both the mother and the fetus died] -
Pichon and Sajous v. France, Case No. 49853/99, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2001) Sentencia en inglés
(2001)[pharmacist complaint inadmissible; pharmacists cannot, based on their religious beliefs, refuse to sell contraceptives that have been prescribed by doctor] -
Grimmark v. Sweden, App. No. 43726/17, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2020) Sentencia en Inglés.
(2020)Sweden's decision not to hire midwives who refused to participate in abortions complied with Article 9, since the freedom to manifest one's religious beliefs is subject to qualifications; applicant's complaint was deemed ... -
Cámara de los Lores, Royal College of Nurses v. Department of Health and Social Security [1981] 1 All E.R. 545.
(1981)[nurses are legally protected from liability when they are involved in abortions in accordance with the 1967 Abortion Act] -
Petition of Mary Teresa Doogan and Concepta Wood, [2013] C.S.I.H. 36. P876/11 Sentencia en inglés
(2013)[overturned 2012 decision, ruling that right to conscientious objection does extend to those supervising health professionals who perform abortions - (but see 2014 case: Greater Glasgow..., above)] -
Greater Glasgow Health Board v. Doogan and another, [2014] UKSC 68 (on appeal from [2013] CSIH 36), December 14, 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Decision online.
(2014)[right to conscientious objection does not extend to those supervising the health professionals who perform abortions] -
NZ Health Professionals’ Alliance v Attorney-General, [2021] NZHC 2510 (*New Zealand High Court) Decision online. Commentary on decision
(2021)[conscientious objection includes duty of effective referral; and employers must accommodate conscientious objection unless doing so would cause unreasonable disruption.] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación [Supreme Court] 2021, Acción de inconstitucionalidad AI 54/2018, Sept 21, 2021. Sentencia en español
(2021)struck down part of the General Law regulating health services nationwide, because it established an expansive right to conscientious objection by medical personnel, without establishing the limits necessary to ensure ... -
Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F. 3rd 771 (1998) (Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals). Decision online.
(1998)Illinois police officer who objected to abortion wanted to be exempt from providing security to abortion clinics on the basis that it acts as religious discrimination; court dismissed the claim] -
Corte Constitucional Sentencia T-388/09, 2009. Sentencia en español.
(2009)[Conscientious objection is not an absolute right; it is only allowed when there is another capable health provider is available soon enough to avoid risking the woman’s life or health.] -
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-209/08, 28 de febrero de 2008. Decisión en español
(2008-02-28)[Conscientious objection can only be invoked by natural persons, not institutions; health care system must guarantee an adequate number of providers to provide services for legal abortions.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, 18 de enero de 2019, STC Rol N° 5572-18-CDS / 5650-18-CDS (acumuladas). Sentencia en español. Extra copia.
(2019)Upheld unconstitutionality claim against new regulations governing institutional conscientious objection
RSS 1.0