Listar Jurisprudencia por título
Mostrando ítems 11-30 de 175
-
C-355/2006. Extractos de la sentencia de la Corte Constitucional que liberalizó la sentencia de la Corte Constitucional que liberalizó el aborto en Colombia,
(Women’s Link Worldwide, 2007)El 10 de Mayo de 2006 la Corte Constitucional colombiana anuncio una decisión histórica; el aborto no podía seguir considerándose un delito en tres cir- cunstancias: cuando la vida o la salud (física o mental) de la mujer ... -
Case on the Crimes of Abortion, Apr 11, 2019 / Case No. : 2017Hun-Ba127, KCCR) (Constitutional Court of Korea) en Ingles, "Major Decisions". PDF downloaded 30 mayo 2019
(2019)Abortion law is unconstitutional and will be abolished in one year unless replaced. -
Case on the Prohibition of Revealing the Sex of a Fetus, Case No. 2004Hun-Ma1010, KCCR (Constitutional Court of Korea). Decision of July 31, 2008. Official summary in English. Extra copy
(2008)Prohibition of fetal sex disclosure is limited to before 32 weeks' gestation. -
Case on the Recognition of Fetuses as Entities with Fundamental Rights, Case No. 2004Hun-Ba81, July 31, 2008. Official Summary.
(2008)Fetus has constitutional right to life, but parents cannot inherit right to sue doctor on fetus's behalf -
CAUSA No 36217-E CCALP “CENTRO DE ESTUDICELS, AMNISTIA INTERNACIONAL ARGENTINA, ELA C/ MUNICIPALIDAD DE LA PLATA S/ AMPARO”
(Poder Judicial de Buenos Aires (Argentina), 2023)Texto de la sentencia. -
Cámara de los Lores, Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. 3 All E.R. 402 (1985). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1985)[doctors can provide advice and contraceptives to girls under the age of 16 without their parents' knowledge or consent] -
Cámara de los Lores, Royal College of Nurses v. Department of Health and Social Security [1981] 1 All E.R. 545.
(1981)[nurses are legally protected from liability when they are involved in abortions in accordance with the 1967 Abortion Act] -
Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 579, File no. 499/16/ 500/16, Decision of Jan 31, 2018 (Ontario: Superior Court of Justice, Divisional Court)
(2018-01-31)Conscientious objectors who are physicians must provide an effective referral to another provider. -
Consejo Constitucional, Décision No. 74-54 DC, D.S.Jur. 529 [1975] A.J.D.A. 134, 15 de enero de 1975. Sentencia en francés. Traducción oficial en Inglés. Extra copia. [
(1975)Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Act upheld as constitutional to allow abortions in cases of necessity or distress after a woman has received counselling. -
Corte Constitucional [Constitutional Court] February 21, 2022, Sentencia C-055-22. English summary by Causa Justa. 27-page Spanish communicado. 27-page unofficial English translation. Nota de Prensa (Spanish). Unofficial English translation.
(2022)Abortion is decriminalized within 24 weeks of gestation -
Corte Constitucional [Constitutional Court], 2018, Sentencia SU-096/18. Decision in Spanish
(2018)Government to facilitate access to abortion despite conscientious objection. -
Corte Constitucional de Croatia. Sentencia de 2 de marzo de 2017. Rješenje Ustavnog Suda Republike Hrvatske, broj: U-I-60/1991 i dr. od 21.veljace 2017. Sentencia en croata
(2017)Upheld as constitutional: Law allowing abortion on request within first ten weeks of pregnancy, and thereafter in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s life, or severe fetal impairments. -
Corte Constitucional Sentencia T-388/09, 2009. Sentencia en español.
(2009)[Conscientious objection is not an absolute right; it is only allowed when there is another capable health provider is available soon enough to avoid risking the woman’s life or health.] -
Corte Constitucional, December 11, 2019, Sentencia SU-599/19.
(2019)Females forced into an armed group who suffer forced contraception or forced abortion qualify as "victims" in reparations law after armed conflict. -
Corte Constitucional, José Fernando Roser Rohde c. Instituto Nacional de Higiene y Medicina Tropical “Leopoldo Izquiéta Pérez y el Ministro de Salud S/Acción deAmparo, 14 de junio de 2006. Spanish Decision (direct download)
(2006)Constitutional court upheld ban of emergency contraceptives, deciding that the rights of women do not take precedence over the rights of the unborn after fertilization occurs. -
Corte Constitucional, March 2, 2020. Expediente D-13225, Boletín No. 25: La ausencia de claridad, certeza, especificidad pertinencia y suficiencia en los cargos de inconstitucionalidad formulados en contra del artículo 122 del Código Penal, condujo a que la Corte se inhibiera de proferir una decisión de fondo. Decisión en español
(2020)Three exceptions to criminal law against abortion will continue; all other abortion remains illegal. -
Corte Constitucional, sentencia C-013/97, 14 de mayo enero de 2002. Sentencia en español
(2002)Proportionality principle requires that criminalization be avoided when the state has less restrictive means to secure the same values -
Corte Constitucional, sentencia no. 27, 98 Foro It. I, 515, 18 de febrero de 1975. Sentencia en italiano. Sentencia en inglés
(1975)[Penal code provision criminalizing all abortions deemed unconstitutional; fetus has a right to life, but abortion will be lawful if continuing the pregnancy endangers the life, physical or mental health of the mother.]