Clasificación por jurisdicción: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 401-420 de 1303
-
Case on the Crimes of Abortion, Apr 11, 2019 / Case No. : 2017Hun-Ba127, KCCR) (Constitutional Court of Korea) en Ingles, "Major Decisions". PDF downloaded 30 mayo 2019
(2019)Abortion law is unconstitutional and will be abolished in one year unless replaced. -
Case on the Prohibition of Revealing the Sex of a Fetus, Case No. 2004Hun-Ma1010, KCCR (Constitutional Court of Korea). Decision of July 31, 2008. Official summary in English. Extra copy
(2008)Prohibition of fetal sex disclosure is limited to before 32 weeks' gestation. -
Case on the Recognition of Fetuses as Entities with Fundamental Rights, Case No. 2004Hun-Ba81, July 31, 2008. Official Summary.
(2008)Fetus has constitutional right to life, but parents cannot inherit right to sue doctor on fetus's behalf -
Corte Constitucional [Constitutional Court] February 21, 2022, Sentencia C-055-22. English summary by Causa Justa. 27-page Spanish communicado. 27-page unofficial English translation. Nota de Prensa (Spanish). Unofficial English translation.
(2022)Abortion is decriminalized within 24 weeks of gestation -
Corte Constitucional, March 2, 2020. Expediente D-13225, Boletín No. 25: La ausencia de claridad, certeza, especificidad pertinencia y suficiencia en los cargos de inconstitucionalidad formulados en contra del artículo 122 del Código Penal, condujo a que la Corte se inhibiera de proferir una decisión de fondo. Decisión en español
(2020)Three exceptions to criminal law against abortion will continue; all other abortion remains illegal. -
Corte Constitucional, December 11, 2019, Sentencia SU-599/19.
(2019)Females forced into an armed group who suffer forced contraception or forced abortion qualify as "victims" in reparations law after armed conflict. -
Corte Constitucional [Constitutional Court], 2018, Sentencia SU-096/18. Decision in Spanish
(2018)Government to facilitate access to abortion despite conscientious objection. -
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-627/12, 10 de agosto de 2012. Decisión en español. Extra copia
(2012)State must provide accurate information; three state officials must correct false information about emergency contraception, abortion and conscientious objection -
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-841/11, 3 de noviembre de 2011. Decisión en español
(2011)[Health administrator forced to pay damages for obstructing a legal abortion in a case where doctor had certified risk to a minor’s mental health.] -
Corte Constitucional Sentencia T-388/09, 2009. Sentencia en español.
(2009)[Conscientious objection is not an absolute right; it is only allowed when there is another capable health provider is available soon enough to avoid risking the woman’s life or health.] -
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-209/08, 28 de febrero de 2008. Decisión en español
(2008-02-28)[Conscientious objection can only be invoked by natural persons, not institutions; health care system must guarantee an adequate number of providers to provide services for legal abortions.] -
Corte Constitucional, sentencia C-013/97, 14 de mayo enero de 2002. Sentencia en español
(2002)Proportionality principle requires that criminalization be avoided when the state has less restrictive means to secure the same values -
Tribunal Constitucional, 18 de enero de 2019, STC Rol N° 5572-18-CDS / 5650-18-CDS (acumuladas). Sentencia en español. Extra copia.
(2019)Upheld unconstitutionality claim against new regulations governing institutional conscientious objection -
Tribunal Constitucional STC Rol 3729-17, 28 de agosto de 2017, Sentencia en español. Extra copia. Accompanying documents. Other Submissions. Síntesis en Espanol. Sentencia en Ingles con Tabla de Contenido por sentencia en espanol.
(2017)Court upheld as constitutional a new law decriminalizing abortion on three grounds: imminent risk to life of mother; fatal fetal disease and pregnancy resulting from rape, but institutions can invoke conscientious objection. -
Tribunal Constitucional, sentencia Rol 740-07-CDS, 18 de abril de 2008. Sentencia en español. Extra copia. [2006 government policy announced availability ofemergency contraception (EC) for anyone over 14
(2008-04-18)Court could not determine medical effects of EC on a fertilized egg, and banned EC since life begins at conception in the Constitution -
Corte Suprema de Justicia, sentencia Rol 2.186-2001, 30 de agosto de 2001. Sentencia en español.
(2001-08)Protection of the unborn begins at conception, so emergency contraception is banned as a form of abortion. -
Corte Suprema de Canadá, Tremblay. v. Daigle [1990] 2 S.C.R. 530, 62 D.L.R. (4th) 634, 8 de agosto de 1989. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1990)A fetus is not a "person" -
Corte Suprema de Canadá, R. v. Morgentaler [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30, 44 D.L.R. (4th) 385, 28 de enero de 1988., Sentencia en Inglés
(1988-01)Decriminalized abortion in Canada; law that allowed abortion only at certified hospitals after approval by an abortion committee is unconstitutional due to excessive requirements and delay in accessing services. -
Corte Suprema de Canadá, McInerney v. MacDonald [1992] 2 S.C.R. 138, 93 D.L.R. (4th) 415, 11 de junio de 1992. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1992-06-11)Patient-physician relationship based on fiduciary duty; physicians to act with the utmost faith and loyalty.