Recursos Jurídicos: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 881-900 de 1833
-
In re NIHRC (Abortion), "In the matter of an application by The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review - In the matter of the failure by the Secretary of State, Executive Committee and Minister of Health to provide women with access to Abortion and Post Abortion Care in All Public Health Facilities in Northern Ireland [2021] NIQB 91 Delivered 14 October 2021. Decision online
(2021)Secretary of State failed to comply with 2019 Act to "expeditiously" provide women in Northern Ireland access to high quality abortion and post abortion services -
R (on the application of A and B) v Secretary of State for Health, decision of [2017] UKSC 41, June 14, 2017 (Supreme Court, U.K.)
(2017)Northern Ireland women are not entitled to NHS-funded abortion in England; re case of 15-year-old girl from NI who had to travel and pay for an abortion -
Ewart's (Sarah Jane) Application," (case also known as Sarah Ewart v NI Departments of Justice and Health), October 3, 2019. (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division).
(2019)Court followed the ruling of the UK Supreme Court that Northern ireland abortion law is incompatible with ECHR Article 8 in relation to fatal foetal abnormality (“FFA” -
In the matter of an application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission forJudicial Review [2018] UKSC27 On appeal from: [2017] NICA 42 (Supreme Court, U.K.), 7 June, 2018. Sentencia en Inglés
(2018)Substantial agreement with NIHRC ruling of 2015 above, but NIHRC lacked standing to bring the appeal, so could not declare NI abortion laws incompatible -
Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission, Re Judicial Review [2015] NIQB 96, November 30, 2015 (High Court of Justice in Belfast). Sentencia en Inglés.
(2015)Northern Ireland’s abortion laws are incompatible with European Convention on Human Rights Article 8 because it does not allow exceptions for fatal fetal abnormalities, rape, or incest.The judgment also has implications ... -
Corte de Apelaciones, Family Planning Association of Northern Ireland v. Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety, [2004] NICA 39 October 8, 2004,. Sentencia en Inglés
(2004)Abortion for fetal abnormality is only lawful the pregnancy threatens the woman’s life OR would have serious and permanent or long term effects on her physical or mental health -
Suprema Corte de Irlanda, McGee v. Attorney General, [1974] I.R. 284, 19 de diciembre de 1973. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1973)Married persons have a constitutional right to make decisions related to family planning, and these are protected by the right to privacy -
Suprema Corte de Irlanda, Baby Oladapo v. Minister for Justice [2002] I.E.S.C. 44, 6 de junio de 2002., Sentencia en Inglés.
(2002)Pregnant refugee claimant appealed a deportation order as a violation of right to life of the unborn; appeal dismissed, court determined right of unborn was not applicable -
Suprema Corte de Irlanda, Attorney General v. X, [1992] I.E.S.C. 1, 5 de marzo de 1992. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1992)Abortion allowed when there is a real and substantial risk to the life of the mother, including risk of suicide. -
Meera Santosh Pal and Ors v Union of India and Ors [2017] Writ Petition (Civil) No. 17 of 2017 January 16 2017 (Supreme Court of India) Sentencia en inglés. Extra copia
(2017)Abortion allowed for anencephalic fetus at 24 weeks due to risk to the woman’s health. -
Indu Devi v the State of Bihar and Others [2017] Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 14327/2017, Judgment of May 9, 2017 (Supreme Court of India). Sentencia en inglés.. Extra copia. Comment on Reprohealthlaw blog
(2017)HIV-positive raped woman tried to obtain an abortion at 17 weeks and experienced undue delays, for which State of Bihar was chastised. At Supreme Court she was 26 weeks pregnant, so request for abortion was denied because ... -
Corte Constitucional, sentencia48/1998 (XI. 23), Magyar Közlöny [Gaceta Ofi cial] MK 1998/105, 18 de noviembre de 1998. Sentencia en húngaro. Extra copia. Traducción oficial en Inglés
(1998)Law allowing abortion when a pregnant woman is in a situation of "grave crisis" was upheld as constitutional, however the determination of "grave crisis" was deemed unconstitutional as it allowed a woman to self-declare ... -
"DECISION 2001-446 DC OF 27 JUNE 2001. Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy (Abortion) and Contraception Act. Constitutional Council. Sentencia en Inglés"
(1982)El fallo analiza la constitucionaldiad del aborto bajo causales hasta la semaana 14 de gestación y la eliminación de la objeción de conciencia institucional por medio de una reforma a la ley de interrupción voluntaria del ... -
Consejo Constitucional, Décision No. 74-54 DC, D.S.Jur. 529 [1975] A.J.D.A. 134, 15 de enero de 1975. Sentencia en francés. Traducción oficial en Inglés. Extra copia. [
(1975)Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Act upheld as constitutional to allow abortions in cases of necessity or distress after a woman has received counselling. -
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016). Decision online. Backup copy. Commentary on case from Planned Parenthood.
(2016)ATexas law which required abortion providers to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centres and that abortion providers must have admitting privileges at a hosptial within 30 miles was declared unconstitutional ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Sentencia en Inglés
(2000)Nebraska law banning partial-birth abortion without regard for health of the mother declared unconstitutional; Court used the undue burden standard developed in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Sentencia en inglés
(1973)14th amendment right to privacy protects a woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion; the right is not absolute and must be balanced against government interests in protecting prenatal health; trimester model was ... -
Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F. 3rd 771 (1998) (Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals). Decision online.
(1998)Illinois police officer who objected to abortion wanted to be exempt from providing security to abortion clinics on the basis that it acts as religious discrimination; court dismissed the claim] -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Sentencia en inglés
(1992)Court upheld Roe v. Wade, new "undue burden" standard in assessing the validity of abortion laws; undue burden defined as “substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability” -
Corte de Apelaciones del Octavo Circuito, Planned Parenthood of Minn., N.D. & S.D. v. Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, (2011). Sentencia revisado de 2012.
(2012)Upheld South Dakota law requiring doctors to inform abortion-seeking patients that abortions increased risk of suicide ideation and suicide; the law was not considered a violation of freedom of speech or due process rights.