Recursos Jurídicos: Recent submissions
Now showing items 1081-1100 of 2079
-
Paton (W.P.) v. United Kingdom, App. No. 8416/78, Eur. Comm’n H.R. (1980). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1980)[man's application surrounding his partner having an abortion without his consent declared inadmissible; Commission noted that this claim was manifestly ill-founded and the woman had the abortion to protect her own life] -
Hercz (R.H.) v. Norway, App. No. 17004/90,Eur. Comm’n H.R. (1992). Sentencia en Inglés
(1992)[man's complaint that his partner had an abortion notwithstanding his objection to the procedure was declared inadmissible] -
Brüggemann and Scheuten v. Federal Republic of Germany, App. No. 6959/75 (1981) 3 E.H.R.R. 244. Sentencia en Inglés
(1981)[German law which criminalized abortion except under certain circumstances did not breach Article 8; a woman’s private life becomes closely connected with the developing fetus] -
Mildred Mapingure v. Minister Of Home Affairs and 2 Others (2014), Judgment No. SC 22/14, Civil Appeal No. SC 406/12 (Zimbabwe, Supreme Court). Sentencia en inglés.
(2014)[police officer and doctor failed to carry out their professional duties; their delays and omissions ended up denying a rape victim an abortion] -
El Tribunal Constitucional del Reino de Tailandia, Sentencia no. 4 de 2563 (2020) ordena la revisión del Código Penal sección 301, que viola las Secciones 27 o 28 de la Constitución de 2017, que respaldan la igualdad de derechos entre hombres y mujeres, así como el derecho y la libertad de todos en su vida y persona. Decisión de 19 de febrero de 2020. Sumario de Corte en ingles)
(2020)[Declared unconstitutional: Criminal Code section 301, allowing a fine or up to three years in prison for a woman who had an abortion; Court ordered revision of this section.] -
Corte Suprema de Apelaciones, Christian Lawyers Association v. Minister of Health and Others, [2004] 4 All SA 31. Sentencia en inglés.
(2004)[Constitutional ruling that "women" in Choice of Termination of Pregnancy Act includes girls under 18, without consent of a guardian, with counselling or a cooling off period.] -
Cámara de los Lores, Royal College of Nurses v. Department of Health and Social Security [1981] 1 All E.R. 545.
(1981)[nurses are legally protected from liability when they are involved in abortions in accordance with the 1967 Abortion Act] -
Tribunal de la Corona de Inglaterra y Gales, R. v. Sarah Louise Catt [2013] EWCA Crim 1187. Sentencia en inglés
(2013)[sentence of woman who pled guilty to administering poison with intent to procure a miscarriage was reduced from 8 years to 3.5 years] -
Tribunal de la Corona de Inglaterra y Gales, R. v. Bourne [1938] 3 All E.R. 615. Resumen y Sentencia en inglés
(1938)[doctor acquitted of performing an abortion on a 14-year-old girl who was gang raped by soldiers, because the woman's life was reasonably thought to be in danger] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, Queen’s Bench Division, R. (on the application of Smeaton) v. Secretary of State for Health, [2002] E.W.H.C. 610. (Admin). Sentencia en inglés.
(2002)prescription, supply and use of emergency contraception does not constitute a criminal offence; emergency contraceptives do not cause miscarriage, because a miscarriage is the termination of an established pregnancy] -
R (on the Application of Crowter and Ors) v SSHSC [2021] EWHC 2536 (Admin) Case No. CO/2066/2020 (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, London) Sept 23, 2021. Judgment and summary
(2020)[fetus has no established rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), so UK abortion law allowing legal abortions in cases of severe fetal abnormalities is compatible with ECHR.] -
Petition of Mary Teresa Doogan and Concepta Wood, [2013] C.S.I.H. 36. P876/11 Sentencia en inglés
(2013)[overturned 2012 decision, ruling that right to conscientious objection does extend to those supervising health professionals who perform abortions - (but see 2014 case: Greater Glasgow..., above)] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, Queen’s Bench Division, Paton v. Trustees of British Pregnancy Advisory Service and Another [1978] QB 276 Casa Exterior, Tribunal de Sesión (Escocia) [Outer House, Court of Session, Scotland]. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1978)[husband has no right to stop his wife from obtaining an abortion] -
Greater Glasgow Health Board v. Doogan and another, [2014] UKSC 68 (on appeal from [2013] CSIH 36), December 14, 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Decision online.
(2014)[right to conscientious objection does not extend to those supervising the health professionals who perform abortions] -
Cámara de los Lores, Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. 3 All E.R. 402 (1985). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1985)[doctors can provide advice and contraceptives to girls under the age of 16 without their parents' knowledge or consent] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health. [2011] E.W.H.C. 235 (Admin). Sentencia en Inglés.
(2011)[interpretation of Abortion Act 1967: women must take first and second doses of pills for medical abortions in a hospital or other health facility] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 75/2010, Diario da Republica vol. 60, 2010.. Sentencia en portugués.
(2010)[upheld as constitutional: law allowing abortion upon request within first 10 weeks: if performed under a doctor’s direction, at an officially recognized health facility, after a mandatory information session and a 3 day ... -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 617/2006, Diário da República I Série, 2006.. Sentencia en portugués
(2006)[The referendum question whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks if completed in a legally authorized health care establishment was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 288/98, Diário da República 91/98 Suplemento I-A Série, 1998. Sentencia en portugués.
(1998)[The referendum question asking the public whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 85/85, Acórdãos do Tribunal Constitucional V,1985. Sentencia en portugués
(1985)[upheld law decriminalizing abortion in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s health or fetal abnormalities]
