Corte Suprema de Nepal, Prakash Mani Sharma v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 064, 2008. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés.
Resumo
[Court action brought over government inaction relating to uterus prolapse; constitutional rights of reproductive health are fundamental, non-derogable, non-restrictive and require meaningful implementation by the state, not only by legislation but also by infrastructure]
Collections
- Jurisprudencia [177]
- Salud sexual y reproductiva [119]
- 6. Asia [12]
Itens relacionados
Apresentado os itens relacionados pelo título, autor e assunto.
-
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Lakshmi Dhikta v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 0757, 2067, Nepal Kanoon Patrika, 2009. Sentencia y el resumen en inglés.
Autor desconhecido (2009)[woman could not afford a legal abortion was forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy and give birth; Court held government has to guarantee safe and affordable abortion services including establishing a fund for abortion costs.] -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Meera Dhungana v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 55, 2058, 2002. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés
Autor desconhecido (2002)[Rape law is unconstitutional because it excluded marital rape; legislature to create new rape law, consistent with decision of the Court.] -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Achyut Kharel v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 3352, 2061, 2008. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés.
Autor desconhecido (2008)law allowing abortion on request of woman within first 12 weeks upheld; no paternal consent required.