Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Sentencia en inglés
Date
1973Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
14th amendment right to privacy protects a woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion; the right is not absolute and must be balanced against government interests in protecting prenatal health; trimester model was employed, such that women could have an abortion on request during first trimester; reasonable regulations in the second and third trimester were permissible as long as there are exceptions for health considerations
Collections
- Jurisprudencia [176]
- Argumentos para la despenalización [192]
- Estados Unidos [32]
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Interpretation of Article 4(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights Consistently with the Human Rights of Women by Joanna Erdman, J.D. Fellow, International Programme on Reproductive and Sexual Health Law and Rebecca J. Cook, J.D. J.S.D., F.R.S.C. Professor of Law, & Faculty Chair in International Human Rights International Programme on Reproductive and Sexual Health Law Faculty of Law University of Toronto
(2005)The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that each year almost 4 million unsafe abortions are performed in Latin America.1 Each year, thousands of Latin American women die from complications related to unsafe abortions, ... -
Abortion and Human Rights - Health and Human Rights Journal Special Section -
(International Campaign for Women's Right to Safe Abortion, 2017-06)The June 2017 issue of Health and Human Rights includes a special section on the intersections between abortion and human rights, and in particular the use of legal mobilization around abortion rights at domestic and ...
