<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/2081">
<title>5. Oceanía</title>
<link>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/2081</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1852"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1851"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1850"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1760"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T15:43:40Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1852">
<title>NZ Health Professionals’ Alliance v Attorney-General, [2021] NZHC 2510 (*New Zealand High Court)   Decision online.     Commentary on decision</title>
<link>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1852</link>
<description>NZ Health Professionals’ Alliance v Attorney-General, [2021] NZHC 2510 (*New Zealand High Court)   Decision online.     Commentary on decision
[conscientious objection includes duty of effective referral; and employers must accommodate conscientious objection unless doing so would cause unreasonable disruption.]
</description>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1851">
<title>Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2012] NZSC 68, 9 de agosto de 2012.Descargar Sentencia en Inglés.</title>
<link>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1851</link>
<description>Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2012] NZSC 68, 9 de agosto de 2012.Descargar Sentencia en Inglés.
[appeal of 2008 case dismissed; Advisory Committee could question consultants about how they were making decisions approving abortion under relevant law, but could not investigate decisions made in individual cases.]
</description>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1850">
<title>Tribunal Superior de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2008] 2 NZLR 825, 9 de junio de 2008. Descargar Sentencia en Inglés</title>
<link>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1850</link>
<description>Tribunal Superior de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2008] 2 NZLR 825, 9 de junio de 2008. Descargar Sentencia en Inglés
[upheld law allowing abortion if continued pregnancy would result in serious danger to woman’s life or physical and mental health; noted that law is applied more liberally than Parliament intended, so review is necessary]
</description>
<dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1760">
<title>High Court of Australia.  Clubb (Appelant) v Edwards (Respondent) [y] Preston (Appelant) v Avery (Respondent)  [2019] HCA 11, (10 de abril de 2019) M46/2018 y H2/2018. Sentencia.</title>
<link>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1760</link>
<description>High Court of Australia.  Clubb (Appelant) v Edwards (Respondent) [y] Preston (Appelant) v Avery (Respondent)  [2019] HCA 11, (10 de abril de 2019) M46/2018 y H2/2018. Sentencia.
Las zonas de acceso seguro fuera de los proveedores de servicios de aborto se confirmaron como constitucionales.
</description>
<dc:date>2019-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
