<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>5. Oceanía</title>
<link href="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/2081" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/2081</id>
<updated>2026-04-03T12:56:44Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T12:56:44Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>NZ Health Professionals’ Alliance v Attorney-General, [2021] NZHC 2510 (*New Zealand High Court)   Decision online.     Commentary on decision</title>
<link href="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1852" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1852</id>
<updated>2023-06-15T02:22:18Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">NZ Health Professionals’ Alliance v Attorney-General, [2021] NZHC 2510 (*New Zealand High Court)   Decision online.     Commentary on decision
[conscientious objection includes duty of effective referral; and employers must accommodate conscientious objection unless doing so would cause unreasonable disruption.]
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2012] NZSC 68, 9 de agosto de 2012.Descargar Sentencia en Inglés.</title>
<link href="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1851" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1851</id>
<updated>2023-06-15T02:22:18Z</updated>
<published>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2012] NZSC 68, 9 de agosto de 2012.Descargar Sentencia en Inglés.
[appeal of 2008 case dismissed; Advisory Committee could question consultants about how they were making decisions approving abortion under relevant law, but could not investigate decisions made in individual cases.]
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Tribunal Superior de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2008] 2 NZLR 825, 9 de junio de 2008. Descargar Sentencia en Inglés</title>
<link href="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1850" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1850</id>
<updated>2023-06-15T02:22:18Z</updated>
<published>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Tribunal Superior de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2008] 2 NZLR 825, 9 de junio de 2008. Descargar Sentencia en Inglés
[upheld law allowing abortion if continued pregnancy would result in serious danger to woman’s life or physical and mental health; noted that law is applied more liberally than Parliament intended, so review is necessary]
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>High Court of Australia.  Clubb (Appelant) v Edwards (Respondent) [y] Preston (Appelant) v Avery (Respondent)  [2019] HCA 11, (10 de abril de 2019) M46/2018 y H2/2018. Sentencia.</title>
<link href="http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1760" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1760</id>
<updated>2023-06-15T02:22:17Z</updated>
<published>2019-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">High Court of Australia.  Clubb (Appelant) v Edwards (Respondent) [y] Preston (Appelant) v Avery (Respondent)  [2019] HCA 11, (10 de abril de 2019) M46/2018 y H2/2018. Sentencia.
Las zonas de acceso seguro fuera de los proveedores de servicios de aborto se confirmaron como constitucionales.
</summary>
<dc:date>2019-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
