Listar por título
Mostrando ítems 554-573 de 2085
-
Corte Constituciónal [Constitutional Court], Acción Pública de Inconstitucionalidad, Expediente No. 34-19-IN/21, 28 de abril de 2021. Sumario en español. Sentencia en español
(2021)Abortion allowed in all cases of rape; previously only allowed in cases of rape if woman had a mental disability. -
Corte de Apelaciones del Octavo Circuito, Planned Parenthood of Minn., N.D. & S.D. v. Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, (2011). Sentencia revisado de 2012.
(2012)Upheld South Dakota law requiring doctors to inform abortion-seeking patients that abortions increased risk of suicide ideation and suicide; the law was not considered a violation of freedom of speech or due process rights. -
Corte de Apelaciones del Segundo Distrito de California, Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital, 208 Cal. App. 3d 405; 256 Cal. Rptr. 240 (1989). Sentencia en inglés
(1989)Catholic hospital did not violate a law when it (1) refused to provide emergency contraception to a rape victim and (2) refused to inform her that she could obtain emergency contraception from a health professional within ... -
Corte de Apelaciones, Family Planning Association of Northern Ireland v. Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety, [2004] NICA 39 October 8, 2004,. Sentencia en Inglés
(2004)Abortion for fetal abnormality is only lawful the pregnancy threatens the woman’s life OR would have serious and permanent or long term effects on her physical or mental health -
Corte Inter-Americana de Derechos Humanos- Manuela y otros v. El Salvador. Amicus Curiae en apoyo a los peticionarios presentado por CLACAI
(CLACAI, 2021)El Consorcio Latinoamericano contra el Aborto Inseguro – CLACAI a través de su Red Jurídica somete a la Honorable Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (en adelante Corte IDH) el presente escrito de amicus curiae, de ... -
Corte Suprema de Apelaciones, Christian Lawyers Association v. Minister of Health and Others, [2004] 4 All SA 31. Sentencia en inglés.
(2004)[Constitutional ruling that "women" in Choice of Termination of Pregnancy Act includes girls under 18, without consent of a guardian, with counselling or a cooling off period.] -
La Corte Suprema de Argentina: Decidiendo en Contra de la Igualdad de las Mujeres |
(La Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica de la Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, 2006)La autora Fiorella Melzi, graduada en el 2005 de nuestro Programa Internacional en Salud Sexual y Reproductiva ha publicado recientemente un artículo basado en su tesis de Maestría (LL.M) en dos revistas de derecho, una ... -
Corte Suprema de Canadá, McInerney v. MacDonald [1992] 2 S.C.R. 138, 93 D.L.R. (4th) 415, 11 de junio de 1992. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1992-06-11)Patient-physician relationship based on fiduciary duty; physicians to act with the utmost faith and loyalty. -
Corte Suprema de Canadá, R. v. Morgentaler [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30, 44 D.L.R. (4th) 385, 28 de enero de 1988., Sentencia en Inglés
(1988-01)Decriminalized abortion in Canada; law that allowed abortion only at certified hospitals after approval by an abortion committee is unconstitutional due to excessive requirements and delay in accessing services. -
Corte Suprema de Canadá, Tremblay. v. Daigle [1990] 2 S.C.R. 530, 62 D.L.R. (4th) 634, 8 de agosto de 1989. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1990)A fetus is not a "person" -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622. (1979). Sentencia en inglés.
(1979)Massachusetts law on parental consent declared unconstitutional; where a state requires a minor to obtain parental consent before procuring abortion, there must also be an alternative procedure for a minor to procure ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. _ (2022) (Supreme Court of the United States), June 24, 2022 Decision online
(2022)Amicus brief by Martha Davis et al. [held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion. -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007). Decisión en Inglés.
(2007)Court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban, a law which effectively banned most late-term abortions: states have an interest in preserving life and the ban fit into this interest as it did not create an undue burden on women -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1976)Declared unconstitutional: a Missouri law requiring spousal consent for a woman to obtain an abortion, and requiring parental consent for a minor to obtain an abortion] -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Sentencia en inglés
(1992)Court upheld Roe v. Wade, new "undue burden" standard in assessing the validity of abortion laws; undue burden defined as “substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability” -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Sentencia en inglés
(1973)14th amendment right to privacy protects a woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion; the right is not absolute and must be balanced against government interests in protecting prenatal health; trimester model was ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Sentencia en Inglés
(2000)Nebraska law banning partial-birth abortion without regard for health of the mother declared unconstitutional; Court used the undue burden standard developed in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey -
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, F., AL, Expediente Letra “F”, No. 259, Libro XLVI, 3 de marzo de 2012.(Arg.), Sentencia en inglés
(2012)Aborto permitido en casos de violación; no es necesaria autorización judicial (Sentencia en inglés) -
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, Portal de Belén–Associación Civil sin Fines de Lucro v. Ministerio de Salud y Acción Social de La Nación s/ amparo, N° P.709.XXXVI, 5 de marzo de 2002. Dictamen del procurador General de la Nación y Fallo de la Corte Suprema
(2002)La marca de anticonceptivos de emergencia “Imediat” se considera abortiva y, por lo tanto, está prohibida